Live dealer: which of the thirty say they have tables

The second column is the one that does the work. A published studio list is the difference between a claim and a claim with a source, and only fifteen brands in the whole register publish one.

Across the fifteen published lists there are three hundred and forty-three distinct studios, and the distribution is extremely lopsided. PG Soft appears on twelve lists. AvatarUX, Endorphina, Evolution, Hacksaw Gaming, Spribe and Pragmatic Play appear on eleven each. Fugaso, GameArt, Platipus, Spinomenal and BGaming on ten. A hundred and seventy-three studios appear exactly once.

That shape explains something readers often find suspicious and should not. Two crypto casinos with visibly similar lobbies are usually not the same company; they have both signed the same dozen suppliers, because those dozen supply nearly everyone. Where two brands really do share an operator, the tell is a shared licence number rather than a shared game list — and there are two such pairs in this register.

It also means the interesting question is not who has Evolution. It is who has anything the others do not, which is a question only the fifteen published lists can answer at all.

Table limits, for a start: none of the thirty publishes them in anything we read.

Nor whether tables run at any particular hour, in any particular language, or with a Japanese-speaking dealer. No operator in this register publishes a dealer-language list we have found, and this site does not guess at one.

And it says nothing about how a dispute at a table would be resolved. That comes back to the licence, which is where every serious question about a casino ends up, and which has its own page.