The top ten, and exactly why each one is there
The ten fullest records among the thirty: what each publishes, what each leaves blank, and the two whose licence lines are worth reading twice.
Written by Rowan Sayer/Last checked:
Compiler of the operator records, working from published terms and licence registers
A top ten on a comparison site is usually a preference presented as a finding. This one is a count. Every operator's record goes through the same ten checks. The weights are fixed and add up to ten points, nobody can adjust the result by hand, and none of the inputs is a field that a commercial arrangement could touch. The resulting order is the one shown for the best crypto casinos in Japan on the front page.
What comes out is a ranking of disclosure: the share of its own business an operator has set down in public, in a form anyone can check. It is the only thing measurable from outside without an account, and it is measured here because the alternative is to invent something. Each brand's full record sits in the casino reviews.
The consequence shows up immediately at the top. Wild.io leads not because anyone preferred it but because it publishes a licence with a live register status, twelve coins, eighty studios, a verification clause, a weekly ceiling and a founding year — nearly the whole card. Stake, far larger by any measure you like, sits well below it because almost none of that could be read.
The ten, and the fields behind each position
The columns below are the scoring inputs, not a summary of the brands. A blank is not a zero, and it never says the operator lacks the thing — only that its document is silent on the point, or that the document was not among those read.
| Brand | Licence | Register | Coins | Studios | Verification | Max withdrawal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild.io | Curaçao OGL/2024/210/0198 | Active | 12 | 80 | Wording | 100,000 per week |
| Rocketpot | Curaçao 1668/JAZ | — | 13 | — | 2,500 USD | 5,000 per month |
| Wolf.bet | Anjouan ALSI-132405048-FI3 | — | 13 | 32 | Wording | — |
| DuckDice | Anjouan ALSI-202509013-FI1 | Valid | 10 | 19 | Wording | — |
| Rainbet | Anjouan ALSI-152406029-FI2 | Valid | 9 | 33 | Wording | — |
| CryptoLeo | Curaçao OGL/2024/1267/0760 | Active | 7 | 13 | Wording | 50,000 per month |
| Windice | Anjouan ALSI-202411018-FI1 | Valid | 7 | 44 | Wording | — |
| Playbet.io | Curaçao OGL/2024/1214/0712 | Active | 3 | 79 | Wording | — |
| Sportsbet.io | Curaçao OGL/2023/110/0072 | Active | — | 110 | 2,500 EUR | — |
| Rakebit | Anjouan ALSI-202602030-FI2 | Valid | 15 | — | Wording | — |
A dash marks a field the operator does not publish. Sources are the operator's own terms, its cashier page or its licence-register entry, all read from 26 to 28 August 2026. Positions are computed; the methodology page lists every weight.
Three rows worth reading closely
Rakebit publishes fifteen coins, the second-longest cashier list among these ten, and states 2024 as its founding year. It is the newest brand in the whole register and one of the more forthcoming, which is a useful reminder that age and disclosure are unrelated — the scoring has no age bonus beyond half a point for publishing a year at all.
Sportsbet.io publishes a hundred and ten studios and a verification threshold of 2,500 EUR, and no cashier list we could find. That is the usual bargain in this market: an operator writes down the half of its business it is marketing, and hardly anyone writes down both halves.
Rocketpot is the only operator in the top ten that splits USDT by chain, with one entry for ERC-20 and another for TRC-20. On a comparison page that is a footnote; at a cashier it is the difference between a deposit arriving and a deposit not arriving.
What is not in the ranking, and could not be
Payout speed, the quality of support, how disputes end, and whether an operator keeps to the clauses it prints. Each of those could only be established with real money at stake. No money was staked, so none of them is an input.
Bonus terms are also absent. No welcome-offer wording was read for any brand in this ranking, so it compares no offers, and any figure you see elsewhere about wagering requirements did not come from us.
Popularity is invisible to the scoring by construction. There is no traffic term and no brand-recognition term, which is exactly why a household name can rank below a site you have never heard of on this page.
Questions people ask
- Why is Stake not in the top ten?
Because there is little on file for it: a Curaçao licence whose register line is active, a restricted list with one entry, and empty fields for the cashier, studio list, verification figure, withdrawal ceiling and founding year. Its position reflects how little of Stake's own documentation could be read, and that reflection is accurate.
- Can a brand pay to enter the top ten?
No. The scoring inputs are all read from the operator record and there is no commercial field among them. The site carries a single paid placement; it is kept out of the ranked table and marked as paid wherever it is shown.
- How often does this order change?
Whenever the record underneath it changes: a document is read again, a register line moves, or a blank is filled from a source that can be cited. Every page shows the date on which its facts were last read.
| # | Brand | Licence | Licence no. | Verification | Studios | Coins | Evidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curaçao Gaming Authority | OGL/2024/210/0198 | Verification | 80 | 12 | 9.0/10 | Open site | |
| 2 | Empire.io | Anjouan Gaming Board | ALSI-132405042-FI3 | USDT 2,000 | 79 | — | 8.8/10 | Open site |
| 3 | Curaçao Gaming Authority | OGL/2023/110/0072 | EUR 2,500 | 110 | — | 8.8/10 | Open site | |
| 4 | CryptoLeo | Curaçao Gaming Authority | OGL/2024/1267/0760 | Verification | 13 | 7 | 8.5/10 | Open site |
| 5 | DuckDice | Anjouan Gaming Board | ALSI-202509013-FI1 | Verification | 19 | 10 | 8.5/10 | Open site |
| 6 | Curaçao Gaming Authority | OGL/2024/1214/0712 | Verification | 79 | 3 | 8.5/10 | Open site | |
| 7 | Rainbet | Anjouan Gaming Board | ALSI-152406029-FI2 | Verification | 33 | 9 | 8.5/10 | Open site |
| 8 | Windice | Anjouan Gaming Board | ALSI-202411018-FI1 | Verification | 44 | 7 | 8.5/10 | Open site |
| 9 | Curaçao Gaming Authority | OGL/2024/930/0387 | Verification | 41 | — | 8.3/10 | Open site | |
| 10 | Curaçao Gaming Authority | OGL/2024/328/0599 | Verification | — | 40 | 8.0/10 | Open site |
The home page ranks the crypto casinos in Japan by what each operator publishes about itself.



