Stake: a large brand with a thin published record

The licence is Curaçao OGL/2024/1451/0918, with an active register line. The published restricted-territory list has a single entry, and Japan is not it — which is why the brand is in this register.

Stake describes a sportsbook, live dealer tables, a VIP programme and provably fair verification on its own site. All four are its own labels, and none is a scoring input.

The cashier list, the studio list, the verification threshold, the withdrawal ceiling and the founding year are all blank, which leaves five of the ten checks unanswered.

None of that means Stake lacks those things. It means they were not found in a form we could read, and this site records the difference rather than guessing across it.

If you want a cashier list for Stake, the honest advice is to read it on Stake's own site before depositing. That is the same advice this site would give about any blank cell anywhere on it.

Across the thirty brands in this register, twenty-seven name a licence authority and twenty-seven carry a licence number. A register status appears for twenty-four, and twenty-seven include verification wording. The less common fields are exactly the ones Stake leaves open: sixteen brands name a coin list, fifteen name a studio list, eight set a withdrawal cap, and six give a founding year.

Stake carries the common licence-line fields: an authority, a number, an active register status, verification wording and a verification clause numbered 4.8. Missing from it are a coin list, a studio list, a verification figure, a withdrawal cap, a withdrawal cap clause and a founding year. That places Stake among the majority for the licence questions but outside the minority that answer the cashier and studio questions.

The rank for coins is blank and the rank for studios is blank, because neither list was read. That is not a judgement on whether Stake offers these things; it simply removes the brand from any comparative position on those two measures. Only sixteen brands supply a coin list and only fifteen a studio list, so Stake's absence there is shared by roughly half the register.

Taken together, the pattern is a record that verifies the operator at the licence level but says little about what a player would actually see at the cashier or in the game lobby. Verification wording is present, but no figure sits beside it to say when KYC becomes routine. A withdrawal ceiling is absent entirely. Those are the gaps a reader feels most when comparing Stake with a brand that carries the full set.

Stake's published line is Curaçao Gaming Authority number OGL/2024/1451/0918, and the register returns an active status for it. This record is not among the revoked lines in the register; the one revoked Curaçao entry belongs to Bets.io under OGL/2024/1178/0479. Three brands in the register name no authority at all: BetPlays, Crashino and Nitrobetting. Stake is not one of them.

A licence number is issued to a company, not to a website. The register shows this directly: ALSI-202508056-FI2 is carried by both Bitkingz and Winz.io, and OGL/2024/1267/0760 is carried by both CryptoLeo and Nine Casino. Stake's number does not appear among the shared numbers in this register, so the line stands alone as far as we have read. The shared examples are the reason a number alone cannot identify a domain.

What the active status does not prove is anything about the cashier, the studio list, withdrawal limits or the promotional page. It does not establish that those parts of the operation have been inspected or approved beyond the licence itself. A reader who stops at the licence line has confirmed only that the register returned an active entry on the date we checked it.

On 28 August 2026 a capture server in the Netherlands reached for Stake's promotional page and met a bot wall. Because the outcome was not read, no headline offer, wagering figure, bonus cap, currency list or Japanese interface could be recorded. That bot check is a fact about our access from a Dutch server, and it carries no information about Japan.

Across all thirty brands, thirteen promotional pages could be read. Nine returned a bot wall like Stake's, six were geo-blocked from our server, and two failed for another reason. Of the ten captures where a headline offer was visible, only two also carried a wagering figure beside it, and only one carried a bonus cap. A headline percentage with no wagering figure next to it is an incomplete offer, and that is the finding the register returns for those pages.

Because Stake's capture did not get past the bot wall, no headline could be recorded at all. The one brand that named yen in a currency list and the two that showed a Japanese interface come from the thirteen pages that were read; Stake was not among them. This section therefore adds nothing about what Stake advertises to any reader, and says nothing about the Japanese market.

The cashier list and coin count are blank. A cashier list would name the cryptocurrencies a deposit can be made in; the coin count would show how many are accepted without opening the cashier. The studio list and studio count are also absent; those would tell a reader which game providers supply the tables and slots and how large that supply is. Without either list, a reader cannot check whether a preferred coin or a familiar studio is present before handing over funds.

The verification figure is blank. Stake's terms carry wording that KYC may be requested at any time and that withdrawals require identity verification, but no amount or trigger is stated. The withdrawal cap and its clause are also blank, so no ceiling on withdrawals appears anywhere in the record we read. Only eight brands in the register set a withdrawal cap, and only three state a verification figure, so Stake's silence is not unusual, but it still removes a comparison point.

The founding year is blank as well. Six brands in the register carry a founding year, but Stake does not. That field would have shown how long the brand has been operating, which is part of any background check. A reader who wants these specifics is left to look on Stake's own cashier page, terms page and licensing page directly; this record cannot supply the answer.